![]() ![]() ![]() “It looks like a law school exam question gone awry,” Friedman said of the law on digital ad taxes.Īs usual in arguments before the court, the judges had questions for both sides. He also said it targets speech and speakers in violation of the First Amendment. In case, after case, after case, almost every case involving a constitutional challenge to a state tax has come up through that way since the establishment of the tax court,” Bernhardt said.īut Jeffrey Friedman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, argued that the tax is “very unconstitutional,” because it targets electronic commerce in violation of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, as well as out-of-state companies in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause. “This court has repeatedly held that constitutional claims are to be presented to the tax court. Business & Finance Click to expand menu. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |